My suggestions for a possible Democracy 2

Discuss the game here, strategy, opinions on policies, and tech support issues.
Rissen
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:11 pm

My suggestions for a possible Democracy 2

Postby Rissen » Fri May 18, 2007 3:09 pm

Well, I'm a really big fan of political games and simulators, and Democracy is certainly one of my favourites. Obviously a game can only be made according to it's creator's wishes, but I'd like to offer some suggestions of what my ideal political simulation would be like:


1) Political groups. You would need to create or join a political party, with it's own name, logo, and manifesto. Perhaps we could see multiple opposition parties, and splits within your own if you are not consistent enough in policies, or you don't keep a tight control on your members.

2) A campaign of some sort. I own Republic: The Revolution, and for all it's flaws it acually contains some good ideas. I'd like to see a system where you have to get yourself elected, American style for example, as the governor of a state, and then from there campaign to become president. As governor you would only have access to the powers that real world governors have. After becoming president you will keep control of the state you became governor of, but the AI governors remain in the other states, either supporting you or opposing you in accordance with your popularity in that state.

3) Ministers. Political personalities would feature heavily, performing all sorts of jobs including newspaper editors and so on. These key figures would be modreately randomised in terms of names, skills and opinions in order to provide variety and choice. When you form a government you will be required to select ministers who will advise you (mostly correctly but according to their own biases and sometimes making major mistakes) and will also carry out the government's plans in their personal areas (helthcare, defence and so on). Perhaps this could be achived by simply selecting an opinion before undertaking an action, with them providing a statement of possible results.

These people will also have their own popularity values and this will affect the public's opinion of the government as a whole. This means that often when your popularity is low you will find yourself having to form a coalition government as a safeguard against impeachment or worse.

4) Parliament. Major decisions will have to be voted on by representatives of each constituency (or state or whatever), which will also prevent you from drastic reforms unless you have a majority.

4) Backbenchers. Sometimes you will face opposition even from your own party, with different solutions depending on your style of presidency. You can kick out troublemakers. enforce discipline with party whips or change policies to satisfy your supporters. This could further be expanded upon, much like in black and white, so your ministers and the public learn from your actions and attempt to emulate you or decide whether they like you or not respecively.

5) A basic economic model. Just to put a little more realism into the economic side. I've explained this in another post but just something so that your decisions will have true real-world outcomes.

6) Corruption. To further imitate real life, presidents will be tempted to do underhanded deals in order to support a lavish lifestyle, for example a palace-building minigame similar to the one in several civilisation games.

7) Pressure groups. When several groups within the population are strongly opposed to a policy, they will form a pressure group which will attempt to do whatever it takes for that law to be changed, including bribes, blackmail and anything else that can be coded.

These are my main ideas, which are no means comprehensive but hopefully you might be able to find something in here worth using, that is if you do decide to create a sequel.
User avatar
cliffski
Positech Staff
Positech Staff
Posts: 7897
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Postby cliffski » Fri May 18, 2007 3:18 pm

I am leaning towards a sequle next, although I am currently faviouring beefing up the simulation side of it (economy etc) than the political side. I have this vision in my head of how it might work, but I think next time around I will design a mroe flexible GUI for it as my first step. Democracy was a good first pass at this new way of doing it.
Rissen
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:11 pm

Postby Rissen » Fri May 18, 2007 3:41 pm

I find both sides interesting so I don't mind either way. Although if you are leaning towards the economic sides I have some more suggestions, which I will collect and post in this thread after I've thought about it some more.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by a more flexible GUI, I'm not too versed in technological terms :?
User avatar
Glinka
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:12 pm

Postby Glinka » Thu May 24, 2007 11:27 am

Aren't the two really interrelated? By which I mean, if for example I spend a fortune on alternative transit systems and raise the gas tax, while motorists will protest, over time we should a shrinkage of the motorist political bloc--simply because there are fewer motorists around. At the same time, the alternative energy folks will not only be pleased, they should see a gradual increase in their numbers with the availability of good, relatively inexpensive alternative means of transportation. It's not as though you can raise the tax high enough to kill the automobile, or fund alternative fuels to such an extent that the bloc of voters convinced by the results swells to enormous proportions, but it should conceivably make a difference in their respective sizes and political clout.
User avatar
cliffski
Positech Staff
Positech Staff
Posts: 7897
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Postby cliffski » Thu May 24, 2007 11:43 am

another of democracies many initial limitations was the frequency (size) of every political group could not be easily targeted by a policy. If I do a sequel, and do it the way I currently am tempted to, all that will change. You will have each person not only be a member of a group, but their membership will be fractional. So you will have die-hard motorists, and then people who hate cars but see no alternative, and policies will be able to tip those on the edge out of that group.
I just need to code it :D

BTW I just changed the forum ranks to sound like rock legend things :D
Rissen
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:11 pm

Postby Rissen » Thu May 24, 2007 12:30 pm

That's brilliant! I hope you make sure that the groups can't change to ridiculous proportions, or if they do the economy goes bust. On one game I had 99% of my population retired farmers...
User avatar
cliffski
Positech Staff
Positech Staff
Posts: 7897
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Postby cliffski » Thu May 24, 2007 2:51 pm

Hoho. thats a good point. It's very fiddly.
User avatar
Carl Sagan
Junior Line Worker
Junior Line Worker
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:56 am

Postby Carl Sagan » Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:58 am

And another thing...

I'd really like to see spin/news management in the game! In politics major problems can be overcome with a healthy dose of news manipulation. It could be anything from funding a government news monitoring service or creating a nationalised news service (like the BBC) you can 'influence' to give a good spin on a government story.

8)
User avatar
ChrisH
Senior Line Worker
Senior Line Worker
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 7:45 pm

Postby ChrisH » Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:57 pm

I have figured out one way (the way?) to win.

*** Spoiler Alert ***

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

In the beginning, I raise taxes, create an import tarriff, cut a lot of spending, and start new programs with long-term positive effects on GDP and productivity. Once the deficit/debt is under control, I lower taxes and create a lot of new programs to make almost everyone (except capitalists and the wealthy) happy.

This way of winning seems to fit left/socialist ideas (which fits my personal taste, hehe). But I think that there should be more than one way to win. Has anyone been able to win consistently with right-wing strategies -- i.e., pleasing capitalists, wealthy, conservatives, patriots, and religious? Success in the long run seems to consist of more government programs, but in the real world, parties that advocate less government win elections at least some of the time.
Rissen
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:11 pm

Postby Rissen » Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:55 pm

That's the way I do it, but I'm pretty sure it can be done with the support of whatever groups you like...
User avatar
Glinka
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:12 pm

Postby Glinka » Thu Jun 07, 2007 4:14 pm

It's a matter of the inherent difficulty of the scenario (nation), and the level of difficulty you've chosen to play.
Rissen
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:11 pm

Postby Rissen » Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:00 pm

Here's another thought, to keep it in the same thread - after playing the demo of Rock Legend, why not use the same (or similar) system as the band member thing to give you a randomised choice of ministers for your government?
User avatar
Glinka
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:12 pm

Postby Glinka » Sun Jun 24, 2007 9:07 pm

Rissen wrote:Here's another thought, to keep it in the same thread - after playing the demo of Rock Legend, why not use the same (or similar) system as the band member thing to give you a randomised choice of ministers for your government?


I've mentioned something like this, except that in order for ministers to be more than window dressing, they would have to possess pre-existing levels of competence, as well as some position on the political spectrum. The "game" part might revolve around trying to push policies they favored, since having your administration push policies they disliked would lead to them jumping ship and denouncing your government. Some reward would have to be created for keeping them happy--perhaps a positive modifier to the effectiveness of a policy in a minister's balliwick? Just an idea.

My ideal for this is Hidden Agenda, a wonderful game that came out in the late 1980s. You had to fill 3 posts, drawing on 12 politicians from 3 different (far left, centrist, far right) parties in a very rocky Central American democracy. If you pushed a policy your chosen minister liked (according to their dossier you read before hiring them), you could be assued they would put it into action. Give them something they didn't like, and it simply wouldn't get done well, assuming it got done, at all. Do the latter often enough, and they'd leave you.
User avatar
cliffski
Positech Staff
Positech Staff
Posts: 7897
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:27 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Postby cliffski » Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:34 am

I love the idea of ministers pushing an agenda. and who knows, this stuff may even get coded one day. For the first time in years I have actually been working on new Democracy code (for a sequel one day). Hurrah!
Rissen
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:11 pm

Postby Rissen » Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:06 pm

I've played Hidden Agenda - it was quite fun, but I didn't like the fact that your choices were so limited in terms of who you could choose as a minister. Also I think that if you have to pander to your ministers then the skill should be choosing ministers which are most like you, not in letting other people (apart from voters) dictate your policies.

As a political scale and an indicator of opinions, I think the scale in Particracy, the online game, is the best I've seen so far.

Return to “Democracy 1”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest