Corporate welfare; Yes, No?

Forum for non-game specific political debate of the issues raised in general by the game. Economics, transport policy, the environment, gun crime etc etc. be nice!
rboni
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 5:20 am
Location: Australia, Perth

Re: Corporate welfare; Yes, No?

Postby rboni » Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:26 am

cliffski wrote:to play devils advocate it also leads to widescale efficiencies of scale.
Only having one rail company is more efficient in terms of scheduling, maintenance etc than having tons of competing ones. The same is true of energy production.
Still not a system I'd like to see though. The potential for government waste, and lack of global competitiveness is a major issue.


Some industries are natural monopolies like public transport, energy production, telecommunications infrastructure, water distribution and the lotteries. The amount of investment required is either too huge for a competitive market to handle, or it’s impossible to create a competitive market without huge public subsidies, or there are negative externalities associated with creating competitive markets like the proliferation of gambling. If a monopoly must exist, I'd rather see it in public hands than private hands, and in the long-run there are no certainties, as technology changes a natural monopoly may disappear.

The purpose of public transport is to take the pressure off the road system. It’s far cheaper for governments to subsidise public transport, than it is to build and maintain extra roads; if public transport did not exist. It is a natural monopoly because it’s not designed to run at a profit. Attempts by governments to split public transport monopolies by creating artificial territories that are then privatised to private providers, just makes public transport more expensive to run, and discourages it.
Last edited by rboni on Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
seamus
Line Manager
Line Manager
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:56 am

Re: Corporate welfare; Yes, No?

Postby seamus » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:42 pm

rboni wrote:
Some industries are natural monopolies like public transport, energy production, telecommunications infrastructure, water distribution and the lotteries. The amount of investment required is either too huge for a competitive market to handle, or it’s impossible to create a competitive market without huge public subsidies, or there are negative externalities associated with creating competitive markets like the proliferation of gambling. If a monopoly must exist, I'd rather see it in public hands than private hands, and in the long-run there are no certainties, as technology changes a natural monopoly may disappear.

the recent telecommunication revolution we have today occured after at&t the monopoly was broken up. However, i agree with you on the other parts.

Return to “Political Debate”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests