Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Discussion of the newest version of the game
User avatar
Blue387
Line Supervisor
Line Supervisor
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:07 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby Blue387 » Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:15 am

With a booming economy, my country attracts immigrants. Could it be made to influence the population of my country and cause other effects? Increased immigration can turn patriots against you, increase unemployment, crime, etc. Perhaps others have discussed this already.
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." - Frank Zappa
rboni
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 5:20 am
Location: Australia, Perth

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby rboni » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:23 am

Minimum wage should be a slider and it should affect unemployment, especially so if border controls are lacks
User avatar
Blue387
Line Supervisor
Line Supervisor
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:07 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby Blue387 » Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:29 pm

rboni wrote:Minimum wage should be a slider and it should affect unemployment, especially so if border controls are lacks


Perhaps after instituting a minimum wage, you could adjust it.
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." - Frank Zappa
rboni
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 5:20 am
Location: Australia, Perth

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby rboni » Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:43 am

Big banks tend to lend to big businesses, and small banks tend to lend to small businesses. A policy situation where a big bank tries to takeover a small bank could be included in the game.

A distinction can be made between big bureaucratic corporations and small entrpreneurial firms
TutGadol
Junior Line Worker
Junior Line Worker
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:50 am

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby TutGadol » Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:56 am

I dont think drugs legalizing should educre crime, drug addicts do more crimes, even tough it reduce crime by making an offence legal.
How about adding tourism? that depends on foreign relations, crime, air travel, diseases and this kind of things. and it would be a way to get money and raise the gdp.
rboni
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 5:20 am
Location: Australia, Perth

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby rboni » Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:05 am

A statutory bill of rights is another policy to consider. It would make liberals happy and upset the public sector because of increases in ligation and also upset conservatives because it would encourage a rights culture to develop.
rboni
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 5:20 am
Location: Australia, Perth

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby rboni » Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:43 am

Large levels of immigration should affect the way a country's infrastructure can cope. In the game, immigration only affects hospital overcrowding, in the real world it affects much more like traffic and public transport congestion, expanding and overcrowded cities, housing ownership affordability and homelessness, demand for utility services.

A negative situation that could be included in the game is electricity blackouts.
Mecha
Junior Line Worker
Junior Line Worker
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:13 am

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby Mecha » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:23 am

I finally got around to buying this great game, the improved Canadian dollar helps to make it more affordable.

Just to help out, here's a few bugs/peculiar things I have noticed that could be patched in the future:

1) In the description of sales tax as a regressive tax, it incorrectly says that sales tax increases income equality when in fact it should say it decreases income equality (or increases income inequality), because that's what regressive means. This is an easily fixed text edit.
2) The model shows higher CO2 emissions positively affecting environmentalists. But this doesn't make any sense because environmentalists would always want lower emissions (therefore shouldn't the line be red not green?).
3) Equality should positively (green arrow) affect Liberals. Right now it only affects socialists, yet equality (in terms of race, sex and culture, not necessarily income) is one of the central tenants of liberalism.
4) GDP should not positively affect unemployment (arrow should be red not green). If GDP is high, unemployment should be low so they should have a negative relationship. Or perhaps unemployment needs to be renamed to employment if that's how the model really works.
5) Likewise, why does GDP negatively affect capitalists? Shouldn't a higher GDP make them happy because the economy is bustling so people are spending more money on their products?
User avatar
Blue387
Line Supervisor
Line Supervisor
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:07 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby Blue387 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:46 am

rboni wrote:Large levels of immigration should affect the way a country's infrastructure can cope. In the game, immigration only affects hospital overcrowding, in the real world it affects much more like traffic and public transport congestion, expanding and overcrowded cities, housing ownership affordability and homelessness, demand for utility services.

A negative situation that could be included in the game is electricity blackouts.


I like your ideas, rboni.
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." - Frank Zappa
heary
Junior Line Worker
Junior Line Worker
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:13 pm

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby heary » Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:21 pm

Hi,
This is Heary I think that the University Grants should reduce productivity if set above a certain point, and perhaps even reduce scientific capability at the highest ends.
In the Canada, where until recently education has been free and students have received substantial grants, people have been shying away from the scientific courses in favour of the arts, resulting in lower production in the short-term they would be out working instead of studying. In a setting where people have to balance the costs of studying with the potential benefits that is, one where students are given less financial help, more people choose to study subjects that are likely to bring them higher wages, such as science, maths and engineering. As it stands, I think most of the game's policies for increasing the country's scientific capability are no-brainers in that they have too little negative impact.
R4games
User avatar
tater
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:48 pm

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby tater » Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:11 pm

rboni wrote:A statutory bill of rights is another policy to consider. It would make liberals happy and upset the public sector because of increases in ligation and also upset conservatives because it would encourage a rights culture to develop.


Rights are at the center of conservatism, particularly things like a Bill of Rights. Conservatism is, if you will, Constitutional Literalism. In the US, for example, a principal difference between conservatives and liberals is how they define rights. Conservatives here properly define the bulk as protection FROM THE GOVERNMENT. "The Congress SHALL NOT..." All other rights not explicitly granted to the government are explicitly (and implicitly) held by the People. It's called (here anyway) positive vs negative rights.

Not all rights are "Natural Rights," obviously, some are statutory, so I'm not sure if you mean in addition to Natural Rights (rights held by the people by virtue of existence—like freedom of thought, etc). Of the US bill of Rights, 8 of the 10 limit government power, the last two make explicit that rights not mentioned are held by the people (or their State governments, but not the feds). Of the 8 that limit government, 5 are "negative" 1 is positive ("... the accused shall enjoy ..."), and 2 are a little of both.

Liberals in the US tend to read rights—even those clearly written in the negative—as positive. They'd say that I have a right to free speech. I'd say I have a right not to have my speech interfered with by the government. They think that I have no right to own a firearm, I see "shall not be infringed" as pretty clear (the notion that it means the military is utter nonsense, it's clear in writings contemporary to the period that it absolutely means the people at large).

I'm not sure what a "rights culture" is, and why business or conservatives would be unhappy with this. The people who would be unhappy would be statists, or others who wish to have excessive centralized power. "Classical liberalism" is in fact "conservative."

Centralized power is always dangerous, IMO. Of course I read books like Death by Government (RJ Rummel, U. Hawaii Press).
deviltrotsky
Junior Line Worker
Junior Line Worker
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:55 am

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby deviltrotsky » Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:21 am

So why does Goverment Control of Industry decrease and upsets trade union?

In Cuba for example the percentage of Trade Union membership is around 90%

And the trade union being upset I think is a bit trickier. In the Soviet Union were the bureocracy oppressed the workers it makes sense. But there are cases and at least in capitalist countries it seems to be the rule were Trade-Unions advocate for the nationalization of industry(Mexico, Venezuela, Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador) So I think it would be fair to say that Trade Union support should go up, not down.
Georgia
Line Manager
Line Manager
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:24 pm

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby Georgia » Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:09 pm

Shouldn't liberals get rather upset when Organ Donation is set to "Universal (No opt-out)"? It seems to me that the government forcibly harvesting everyone's organs would make them angry, though they wouldn't really mind the other range of options.
rboni
Supreme Robot
Supreme Robot
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 5:20 am
Location: Australia, Perth

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby rboni » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:23 am

Open borders should upset environmentalists. The more people their are the more prevalent environmental destruction is.
Georgia
Line Manager
Line Manager
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:24 pm

Re: Policy Effect change proposals, and your thoughts

Postby Georgia » Sat Apr 17, 2010 9:01 am

rboni wrote:Open borders should upset environmentalists. The more people their are the more prevalent environmental destruction is.


I'm not too sure about that. The actual world population doesn't increase, so I would argue total environmental degradation doesn't either. Furthermore, the people aren't always made unhappy by things that should make them unhappy. I have honestly never seen an environmentalist draw a connection between immigration and environmental destruction. The environmental effect seem pretty negligible if you ask me. If one assumes your argument to be true, then it should decrease Air Quality, which upsets environmentalists by proxy, rather than directly affect them.

Return to “Democracy 2”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests